The Bond Blogger is the blog of news links and commentary from The Bond Buyer. To learn more about the blog and its content, please read this post. To learn more about the bloggers, read this post.

« The Bon... | Main | Today's BB: P3s in... »
http://blog.bondbuyer.com/bondbuyer/date/20070417 Tuesday April 17, 2007

Today’s BB: The Big 4 Strike Back

Add all four of the nation’s largest accounting firms to the growing chorus of critics urging Texas officials to step back from their threat to flout the Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s Statement 45 on “Other Post-Employment Benefits.”


In a letter to state legislators, representatives from Deloitte & Touche, KPMG, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, and Ernst & Young warn that failing to follow the new guidelines on calculating and reporting retiree health care liabilities could lead to “qualified” audits, which would, in turn, interfere with the state’s ability to borrow in the municipal bond market.


Texas officials, led by first-year Controller Susan Coombs, have argued that because retiree health care assistance is not guaranteed by law or contract, the legislature can revoke or reduce it at any time, so a calculation of future liabilities is meaningless -- and could be harmful, as the large numbers involved could spark a premature reduction in benefits.


But Statement 45 proponents respond that public employees are powerful enough as an interest group to guarantee that the legislature would never exercise that “out.”

Elsewhere, Chicago celebrated its selection as the U.S. candidate city for the 2012 Olympics (a topic we’re looking forward to covering in more depth next month at The Bond Buyer’s Midwest Public Finance Conference), and the push for a “flatter” tax became bipartisan.



Posted by bondbuyer [The Costs of Retirement] ( April 17, 2007 06:59 AM ) Permalink | Comments[2]
Comments:

I have tried to send you emails, but they boomerang back. You might want to check your contact us link.

I have been following your articles about the Texas OPEB position. Their position is not well thought, and will likely only hurt themselves. How good would you feel if you were a long time State employee and were told the health care benefit you were promised...well they were only kidding? As a bond investor, why would I invest in a deal that that can't get a clean audit. Since Texas is against disclosure, we can't help but wonder what else aren't they disclosing? So...now they have alienated both the employees and the bondholders, because they don't want to disclose their $50 billion OPEB liability, which everyone already knows about. Go figure!

Posted by Len Templeton on April 18, 2007 at 12:04 AM EDT #

Note that the Social Security Administration is trying to do the same thing with Federal pension liability.

Posted by Alexander Hamilton on April 18, 2007 at 10:38 AM EDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed